![Magit for aquamacs](https://kumkoniak.com/76.jpg)
Various free/libre software developers, including volunteers and commercial developersĮmacs / ˈ iː m æ k s/ or EMACS ( Editor MACroS) is a family of text editors that are characterized by their extensibility. However I still use revbuffs whenever I do a rebase outside of emacs.Org-mode, Magit, and Dired buffers in GNU Emacs I've been using magit for a year now and can highly recommend it for dealing with git from within emacs. I will investigate magit a little more thoroughly though. (I haven't quite been using emacs long enough to make it my operating system). I'd kind of guessed that if I accessed git from within emacs, then it could probably be handled easier, but I currently prefer accessing git through the commandline. I prefer revbuffs simply because of a, possibly irrational, feeling of wanting to be in control of what happens. Global-auto-revert mode would have been a perfectly fine solution, and I wish I could choose two answers. Kind of similar to Cmd-R in other Mac apps). (I mapped revbuffs to Cmd-R which works quite nicely. Certainly enough to stop me wanting to try and write anything new myself. Well, I've found the revbuffs package to be pretty much what I need. PS I'm using Aquamacs on OSX if that matters. I'm fairly happy writing emacs-lisp if people can give me pointers on where to start. Secondly I'd like a command that reverted (without query) all my open buffers that have no unsaved changes, and queried me about those that do have unsaved changes.Īlternatively, I'd be open to suggestions about other solutions, ways of working, etc I could try. Often, when I switch branches in git, if the files are open in emacs, then emacs asks if I want to revert them (as it thinks they've changed on disk) even though the contents are identical.įirstly I'd like to find a way for emacs to not ask me about it at all if the contents on disk are identical to those in the buffer.
![Magit for aquamacs](https://kumkoniak.com/76.jpg)